Friday, August 15, 2014

That Way Of Giving A Name

It’s after all a name – one single name, of somebody or something, animate or inanimate.

What’s there so special in giving a child, a pet, a home you reside, an institution a name? Does this have any impact? Does this create any impression? Does this define something about someone or something? Is it capable of relating, remembering, or stimulating your imagination? Answers can be in affirmative and/or in negative.  

We can do without a name of a pet or our residence. But no human individual in the world is without a name! For, it’s basic to identify someone by a name. Our names help us to sign, register, attest, certify, clarify and prove a point. Pragmatically, name assumes significance at least for us humans.  

An adult may not have much to do with his or her name; but a child, a growing personality, has. It contributes a lot in shaping their self esteem, self-faith. They don’t want to be bullied or ridiculed among peers by their names given by parents! Meaningful names make them feel proud. And, interestingly, we see adults changing their names for various reasons! Thus names and for that matter name-giving do have major roles to play.

The name-giving tradition both in lesser and major cultures of India is as old as its civilization itself. It’s indeed a festival like special occasion involving people to observe with a lot of family and community rituals and with a deep feeling of belongingness. Name-giving ceremonies and celebrations vary from culture to culture and time to time. Also, we see how contemporary name trends and patterns evolve depicting generational gaps. Like inter-cultural, now even global relations determine name and name-giving trends and patterns. A purely Indian baby today may have a Chinese or French name and vice versa!

Priests, respectable persons of the family, close relatives and friends, teachers, community or organizational heads are generally entrusted to give name to a child, a pet or an institution. The name is accepted by all the concerned.

When entrusted to give a name how would you think and feel about it? You must take note of various conditions like time, culture, people concerned, necessity, future implication, heredity and other contexts before proposing a name. But in many cases the assignee’s emotion and complacency rule the roost. 

Whatever the name, name giving is well settled when the rightful or any hierarchy takes charge of the activity. Gladly or willy-nilly, others have to accept. The authority of parents to name their child is obvious. When the highest authority in politics, industry or bureaucracy name an institution, that gets final. Sometimes people without any portfolio are also asked for to give a name, may be for the sake of inclusiveness, acceptability, equality or some other good reasons.  

It’s when more people are engaged to propose a name the task gets tougher! Every single person with many ideas, emotions and expectations comes with a name to propose and get accepted. Here, all those involved in the whole process must have to reach at a consensus to opt a name by priority and broad-based context. Otherwise, take resort to voting.    
  
            Those who nurture an emotion to name someone or something and wish to be accepted among others they, instead of a single name, prepare a list of them and propose. Here’s a more possibility of getting accepted than rejected. It can be more interesting if you are the only proposer. Because, you with a name list give the party a chance to make their own choice! You involve the party in the process and make them feel they have also given the name.

            Ultimately, who has given the name? Ah, how wonderful!

Sometimes so happens, the party concerned may stumble at more than one out of the list and again seek your advice. You finally give one to settle the matter. Thus name giving becomes an activity of mutual love and respect – isn’t it a ceremony and celebration?